The animation above shows my most recent PET scan. See the bright yellow sparkles in the pair of otherwise dark areas above the center of the image? Those are the tumors in my lungs. Some appeared since the last set of scans; others are metabolizing more, and thus showing up brighter. For comparison, the left image below is from last November, and the right is from this most recent scan.
These are not good results. Obviously, the chemotherapy has not prevented tumor growth. Medical literature would say I have reached the regimen's "time to progression", that is, the point after starting treatments at which the disease advances or reappears. Despite the provocative title of this post, that does not necessarily mean that the chemotherapy has stopped working; it just means it is time to try something else.
Unfortunately, my options have become much more limited over the past year. By last March, I had long passed the maximum lifetime dosage of one drug (ifosfamide). Last July, side effects prompted my oncologists to remove another (docetaxel) from my treatments. These latest results show that the remaining drug (gemcitabine) alone has not been effective.
My oncologist searched through the medical literature for other treatments. There is not much, since I have already tried almost everything, and the pool of patients with recurrent, metastatic osteosarcoma is so small as to limit the number of clinical trials for new drugs. Nevertheless, he found one clinical case study in which a combination of gemcitabine and a drug called irinotecan most often used to treat colon cancer was beneficial in a case very similar to mine.
The combination of gemcitabine and irinotecan has shown acceptable toxicity and synergistic activity against many refractory solid tumors. Our case report demonstrates an excellent clinical and radiographic response in a heavily pretreated patient with recurrent osteogenic sarcoma...Due to the absence of a radiographic response to gemcitabine and irinotecan used as single agents, we think that synergism between the 2 drugs makes their combination effective.
So far I have undergone one cycle of treatments with this new pair of drugs. Time will tell if it will work for me.
But truthfully, while I remain optimistic, I don't expect to find the silver bullet. At best, this new regimen will most likely just stabilize tumor growth, and the prospects of experimental treatments or more drastic alternatives like surgery or radiation are not much better. That makes, "try something else and see if it works," an unsatisfying answer to the question posed in the title of this post, but it is the only answer I have for now.



Antonio Zamora Says:
I came to your blog to look at one of your programming posts, and unexpectedly ran into your cancer posting. Given the inability to stop the progression of your cancer with chemotherapeutic agents, you may want to try high doses of Vitamin D3, in the amount of about 10,000 IU per day. Here are some links about the effect of Vitamin D.
Best wishes,
Antonio Zamora
http://www.grassrootshealth.net/media/download/disease_incidence_prev_chart_101608.pdf
===
http://www.vitamindcouncil.org/vitaminDToxicity.shtml
===
Am J Public Health. 2006 Feb;96(2):252-61. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention.
Garland CF, Garland FC, Gorham ED, Lipkin M, Newmark H, Mohr SB, Holick MF.
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, 0631C, University of California-San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0631, USA. cgarland@ucsd.edu
Vitamin D status differs by latitude and race, with residents of the northeastern United States and individuals with more skin pigmentation being at increased risk of deficiency. A PubMed database search yielded 63 observational studies of vitamin D status in relation to cancer risk, including 30 of colon, 13 of breast, 26 of prostate, and 7 of ovarian cancer, and several that assessed the association of vitamin D receptor genotype with cancer risk.The majority of studies found a protective relationship between sufficient vitamin D status and lower risk of cancer. The evidence suggests that efforts to improve vitamin D status, for example by vitamin D supplementation, could reduce cancer incidence and mortality at low cost, with few or no adverse effects.
PMID: 16380576 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]